Leonardo"s Notebook by Mattheus Mei

I have been impressed with the urgency of doing. Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Being willing is not enough; we must do.
Showing posts with label Hillary. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hillary. Show all posts

Friday, November 14, 2008

Coincidence or not?

By now everyone knows that Obama - from the land of Lincoln - said he's read Dorris Kearns Goodwin and wants to form a Team of Rivals. Political shrewdness aside the rumors that Hill may be appointed Secretary of State it has an eerie similiarity to Lincoln's own choice -- Seward, who was the Senator of New York.

The key is New York.

Hillary is the Senator from New York, Seward is from New York -- cue creepy music.



Wonder if Hillary will balk like Seward did?

Sphere: Related Content

Sunday, September 14, 2008

Live from New York, the media needs to grow a pair



It's sad that the Media can't touch anything because they, like the Demos, aren't being defferential enough, or sexist. It's up to our comedians who seem to have a foot in both worlds to attempt to call us to our intellectual and purely AMERICAN senses. Secular Prophets.

Sphere: Related Content

Saturday, August 30, 2008

It says so much....

Palin booed for mentioning Hillary Clinton

The only question is did the Republican's not get the memo, or are the Clintonistas not impressed by the pandering... or both.

Sphere: Related Content

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

People around the world

Join hands, start a love train, love train!

Thank you Hillary....

Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, August 26, 2008

Pat Buchanan: Spewing Republican Talking Points

Pat Buchanan is trying to push the McCain talking points and saying that her speech was a failure and trying to push the meme that a sizable portion of her followers out of fanatic love will not do as she said for them to do earlier tonight - which she said in not doing would be an insult to her and everything she stands for. It's amazing to what extent Republicans will try and run the narrative to say that democrats are still divided. The response is they're not divided. After Ted's speech and now Hillary's and PUMA groups left out there may have a few wayward democratic souls within their ranks, but will show their true natures as Republican shill groups. I've always thought this struggle that the media hyped was just that - hype. According SC's blogging delegate Tim Kelly, despite all the protests, with all the delegates that the actual number of PUMAs present were always minimal, but these groups were always around the news media crowding around the cameras. Sound familiar? It should, it's what terrorist groups in the middle east, who are comprised of 5 people and a cat do to say that a majority of folk are anti-whatever... The fact remains if you were to pan back you'd see what a small group they are. Anywho, it's time for bed.

Sphere: Related Content

Hillary Quote of the night

No Way. No How. No McCain.

Sphere: Related Content

An Evening with Hillary

Welcome to THE SC Democratic Party's place for live blogging, Cover it Live, tonight hosted by yours truly - Mattheus Mei (thanks Tim). You can observe below and join in as a "commenter." If the screen below is too small that you can't read or can't comment, please go here.

So pull up a chair, turn the TV on, grab your favourite (adult) beverage and join the fun as we have have an evening with Hillary Clinton. The show officially begins at 8:30, but we may get started a little earlier!

Sphere: Related Content

Wednesday, August 20, 2008

Oh Ms. Dowd


Maureen Dowd is one of my favourite opinion columnists for the NYTimes. And her skills at sardonic fiction are always appreciated. Check out her latest Two Against The One. HRC can not and will not get over herself and though this is a work of fiction, it's based in some elements of truth.

Sphere: Related Content

Thursday, August 14, 2008

Quote of the Day

"It's utter nonsense for Hillary to imply that the alleged 18 million form a solid, lardlike block sworn to her, as in some fascist regime, and that if they aren't "heard" at the convention, they will swarm like lemmings to the edge of a cliff and fling themselves off.
The Clintons and their surrogates have clearly been encouraging and fomenting resentment and rebellion, even while angelically maintaining deniability. Conventions aren't the place for "catharsis" -- how absurd. Let all those dizzy dames go off on a spa week for a bout of Arthur Janov's primal scream therapy. (Remember that? John Lennon bawling for mom on the "Plastic Ono Band" album.) Hillary is setting feminism back -- defining women as petulant brats driven by emotion rather than logic and fair play. This entire election wasn't about gender and sexism -- until the profligate, mismanaging Hillary began losing and grasping at straws. For Minerva's sake, let's move on to a fresh new generation of female leadership!"
-Camille Paglia, Accent the Negative

(Really, they won't? I was kind of hoping they would - the crazy nutters)

Sphere: Related Content

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

Quote of the day

“A woman who wildly mismanages and bankrupts a quarter-of-a-billion-dollar campaign operation, and then blames sexism in society, will dampen the dreams of our daughters.”

-Maureen Dowd, Yes, She Can

Sphere: Related Content

Thursday, August 07, 2008

Railroading Rep. Steve Cohen: reverse racism, reverse sexism, homophobia, and anti-semitism

From a friend of mine in an e-mail:


This looks really bad at first, like a racist southerner throwing the term "Armenian" around a lot, hatefully, but there's more to the story:




It's discouraging to see in the Presidential race a post-identity politics candidate who speaks of coming together, putting differences aside and working for the greater good - ultimately fulfilling King's Dream and then within his own party the exact opposite.

Here you have a smack in the face to one of the most liberal democrats in the Congress who's being beleaguered simply because he's a white male representing an overwhelmingly African-American congressional district. Has he done anything in congress against those he represents? Far from it. But his opponent in the primary is an African-American Female who insists that the only person "fit" to represent an overwhelmingly African-American District is an African-American. Not only that his opponent, Ms. Tinker has run a campaign that would make even Karl Rove cringe, calling for his ouster because he's Jewish and because he supports LGBT rights. And the hyper feminist group Emily's List is behind his opponent despite his pro-choice record, why, because his opponent is a female.


But why the kerfuffle over the "Armenian Photographer" (who's in the bag for Tinker)? Well American Armenians are rather upset about Cohen's vote against the "Genocide Resolution" in Congress that would have labeled the mass death of the Armenians at the hands of the Ottoman Turks as genocide mainly as a measure to protect our troops. But there's potentially more. Armenians themselves over the years have been virulently antisemitic, and as of lately there's been a huge rise in antisemitism in the home country. One can't help but infer that historical memory is also in play when it comes to Mr. Cohen and his bid to retain his seat.

It begs the question, is this the dark underbelly of the Democratic party? Is the coalition to broad and inclusive? Has the post-identity politics of Barack Obama not sent these types of Partisans to the hills? The short of it is unfortunately not. If it's not Ms. Tinker's campaign against Cohen, it's the PUMAs out there, and other groups of people who simply can't let go of past transgressions and mentalities and work for the common good, unless that common good is fashioned in their image. Howard Dean, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Barack Obama - and yes, even you Mrs. Clinton have a lot of work to do to dismantle the hold identity politics have on your party and reeducate these fervent foot soldiers.

Sphere: Related Content

Friday, June 06, 2008

The Mad TV interpretation of a Unity Ticket

Jeanne Moos from CNN was talking about comedians and not wanting Clinton to drop from the race. It got J to searching YouTube when he came across this video, which involves little people, which is in and of itself scary. Well after I saw that video that both made me giggle and also scared the crap out of me I saw this video:

It reminded me of what type of field day comedians would have with this notion of a Unity Ticket (Thanks Mad TV), something which I seriously doubt will happen no matter how much Lanny Davis whines about it. Mr. Davis, get over it and go to political Rehab.

Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, June 03, 2008

'This was her night'

CNN Just announced that they received several e-mails from the Clinton campaign right after the Obama speech criticising them for their reporting on Clinton's speech a direct quote reported on the air, 'This was her night,' that Obama shouldn't have made his victory speech tonight because she needs time to decompress. They then noted that Obama's speech was not self-congratulatory but instead about the people. And that's the difference between Obama and Clinton if you ever didn't understand it.


Her night.... yeah right.

Sphere: Related Content

Obama's Victory Speech

Despite one shadow over the evening's festivities (which everyone resents), what an Historic night, what a great speech, what a great moment for Americans to reflect on where we are, where we've been and where plan to go from here. Here's the text from the speech:

Tonight, after 54 hard-fought contests, our primary season has finally come to an end.

Sixteen months have passed since we first stood together on the steps of the Old State Capitol in Springfield, Illinois. Thousands of miles have been traveled. Millions of voices have been heard. And because of what you said—because you decided that change must come to Washington; because you believed that this year must be different than all the rest; because you chose to listen not to your doubts or your fears but to your greatest hopes and highest aspirations, tonight we mark the end of one historic journey with the beginning of another—a journey that will bring a new and better day to America. Tonight, I can stand before you and say that I will be the Democratic nominee for president of the United States.

I want to thank every American who stood with us over the course of this campaign—through the good days and the bad; from the snows of Cedar Rapids to the sunshine of Sioux Falls. And tonight I also want to thank the men and woman who took this journey with me as fellow candidates for president.

At this defining moment for our nation, we should be proud that our party put forth one of the most talented, qualified field of individuals ever to run for this office. I have not just competed with them as rivals, I have learned from them as friends, as public servants, and as patriots who love America and are willing to work tirelessly to make this country better. They are leaders of this party, and leaders that America will turn to for years to come.

That is particularly true for the candidate who has traveled further on this journey than anyone else. Senator Hillary Clinton has made history in this campaign not just because she's a woman who has done what no woman has done before, but because she's a leader who inspires millions of Americans with her strength, her courage, and her commitment to the causes that brought us here tonight.

We've certainly had our differences over the last sixteen months. But as someone who's shared a stage with her many times, I can tell you that what gets Hillary Clinton up in the morning—even in the face of tough odds—is exactly what sent her and Bill Clinton to sign up for their first campaign in Texas all those years ago; what sent her to work at the Children's Defense Fund and made her fight for health care as first lady; what led her to the United States Senate and fueled her barrier-breaking campaign for the presidency—an unyielding desire to improve the lives of ordinary Americans, no matter how difficult the fight may be. And you can rest assured that when we finally win the battle for universal health care in this country, she will be central to that victory. When we transform our energy policy and lift our children out of poverty, it will be because she worked to help make it happen. Our party and our country are better off because of her, and I am a better candidate for having had the honor to compete with Hillary Rodham Clinton.

There are those who say that this primary has somehow left us weaker and more divided. Well I say that because of this primary, there are millions of Americans who have cast their ballot for the very first time. There are independents and Republicans who understand that this election isn't just about the party in charge of Washington, it's about the need to change Washington. There are young people, and African Americans, and Latinos, and women of all ages who have voted in numbers that have broken records and inspired a nation.

All of you chose to support a candidate you believe in deeply. But at the end of the day, we aren't the reason you came out and waited in lines that stretched block after block to make your voice heard. You didn't do that because of me or Senator Clinton or anyone else. You did it because you know in your hearts that at this moment—a moment that will define a generation—we cannot afford to keep doing what we've been doing. We owe our children a better future. We owe our country a better future. And for all those who dream of that future tonight, I say—let us begin the work together. Let us unite in common effort to chart a new course for America.

In just a few short months, the Republican Party will arrive in St. Paul with a very different agenda. They will come here to nominate John McCain, a man who has served this country heroically. I honor that service, and I respect his many accomplishments, even if he chooses to deny mine. My differences with him are not personal; they are with the policies he has proposed in this campaign.

Because while John McCain can legitimately tout moments of independence from his party in the past, such independence has not been the hallmark of his presidential campaign.

It's not change when John McCain decided to stand with George Bush 95 percent of the time, as he did in the Senate last year.

It's not change when he offers four more years of Bush economic policies that have failed to create well-paying jobs, or insure our workers, or help Americans afford the skyrocketing cost of college—policies that have lowered the real incomes of the average American family, widened the gap between Wall Street and Main Street, and left our children with a mountain of debt.

And it's not change when he promises to continue a policy in Iraq that asks everything of our brave men and women in uniform and nothing of Iraqi politicians—a policy where all we look for are reasons to stay in Iraq, while we spend billions of dollars a month on a war that isn't making the American people any safer.

So I'll say this—there are many words to describe John McCain's attempt to pass off his embrace of George Bush's policies as bipartisan and new. But change is not one of them.

Change is a foreign policy that doesn't begin and end with a war that should've never been authorized and never been waged. I won't stand here and pretend that there are many good options left in Iraq, but what's not an option is leaving our troops in that country for the next hundred years—especially at a time when our military is overstretched, our nation is isolated, and nearly every other threat to America is being ignored.

We must be as careful getting out of Iraq as we were careless getting in—but start leaving we must. It's time for Iraqis to take responsibility for their future. It's time to rebuild our military and give our veterans the care they need and the benefits they deserve when they come home. It's time to refocus our efforts on al-Qaida's leadership and Afghanistan, and rally the world against the common threats of the 21st century—terrorism and nuclear weapons; climate change and poverty; genocide and disease. That's what change is.

Change is realizing that meeting today's threats requires not just our firepower, but the power of our diplomacy—tough, direct diplomacy where the president of the United States isn't afraid to let any petty dictator know where America stands and what we stand for. We must once again have the courage and conviction to lead the free world. That is the legacy of Roosevelt, and Truman, and Kennedy. That's what the American people want. That's what change is.

Change is building an economy that rewards not just wealth, but the work and workers who created it. It's understanding that the struggles facing working families can't be solved by spending billions of dollars on more tax breaks for big corporations and wealthy CEOs, but by giving the middle-class a tax break, and investing in our crumbling infrastructure, and transforming how we use energy, and improving our schools, and renewing our commitment to science and innovation. It's understanding that fiscal responsibility and shared prosperity can go hand-in-hand, as they did when Bill Clinton was president.

John McCain has spent a lot of time talking about trips to Iraq in the last few weeks, but maybe if he spent some time taking trips to the cities and towns that have been hardest hit by this economy—cities in Michigan, and Ohio, and right here in Minnesota—he'd understand the kind of change that people are looking for.

Maybe if he went to Iowa and met the student who works the night shift after a full day of class and still can't pay the medical bills for a sister who's ill, he'd understand that she can't afford four more years of a health care plan that only takes care of the healthy and wealthy. She needs us to pass a health care plan that guarantees insurance to every American who wants it and brings down premiums for every family who needs it. That's the change we need.

Maybe if he went to Pennsylvania and met the man who lost his job but can't even afford the gas to drive around and look for a new one, he'd understand that we can't afford four more years of our addiction to oil from dictators. That man needs us to pass an energy policy that works with automakers to raise fuel standards, and makes corporations pay for their pollution, and oil companies invest their record profits in a clean energy future—an energy policy that will create millions of new jobs that pay well and can't be outsourced. That's the change we need.

And maybe if he spent some time in the schools of South Carolina or St. Paul or where he spoke tonight in New Orleans, he'd understand that we can't afford to leave the money behind for No Child Left Behind; that we owe it to our children to invest in early childhood education; to recruit an army of new teachers and give them better pay and more support; to finally decide that in this global economy, the chance to get a college education should not be a privilege for the wealthy few, but the birthright of every American. That's the change we need in America. That's why I'm running for president.

The other side will come here in September and offer a very different set of policies and positions, and that is a debate I look forward to. It is a debate the American people deserve. But what you don't deserve is another election that's governed by fear, and innuendo, and division. What you won't hear from this campaign or this party is the kind of politics that uses religion as a wedge, and patriotism as a bludgeon—that sees our opponents not as competitors to challenge, but enemies to demonize. Because we may call ourselves Democrats and Republicans, but we are Americans first. We are always Americans first.

Despite what the good Senator from Arizona said tonight, I have seen people of differing views and opinions find common cause many times during my two decades in public life, and I have brought many together myself. I've walked arm-in-arm with community leaders on the South Side of Chicago and watched tensions fade as black, white, and Latino fought together for good jobs and good schools. I've sat across the table from law enforcement and civil rights advocates to reform a criminal justice system that sent thirteen innocent people to death row. And I've worked with friends in the other party to provide more children with health insurance and more working families with a tax break; to curb the spread of nuclear weapons and ensure that the American people know where their tax dollars are being spent; and to reduce the influence of lobbyists who have all too often set the agenda in Washington.

In our country, I have found that this cooperation happens not because we agree on everything, but because behind all the labels and false divisions and categories that define us; beyond all the petty bickering and point-scoring in Washington, Americans are a decent, generous, compassionate people, united by common challenges and common hopes. And every so often, there are moments which call on that fundamental goodness to make this country great again.

So it was for that band of patriots who declared in a Philadelphia hall the formation of a more perfect union; and for all those who gave on the fields of Gettysburg and Antietam their last full measure of devotion to save that same union.

So it was for the greatest generation that conquered fear itself, and liberated a continent from tyranny and made this country home to untold opportunity and prosperity.

So it was for the workers who stood out on the picket lines; the women who shattered glass ceilings; the children who braved a Selma bridge for freedom's cause.

So it has been for every generation that faced down the greatest challenges and the most improbable odds to leave their children a world that's better, and kinder, and more just.

And so it must be for us.

America, this is our moment. This is our time. Our time to turn the page on the policies of the past. Our time to bring new energy and new ideas to the challenges we face. Our time to offer a new direction for the country we love.

The journey will be difficult. The road will be long. I face this challenge with profound humility, and knowledge of my own limitations. But I also face it with limitless faith in the capacity of the American people. Because if we are willing to work for it, and fight for it, and believe in it, then I am absolutely certain that generations from now, we will be able to look back and tell our children that this was the moment when we began to provide care for the sick and good jobs to the jobless; this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal; this was the moment when we ended a war and secured our nation and restored our image as the last, best hope on earth. This was the moment—this was the time—when we came together to remake this great nation so that it may always reflect our very best selves and our highest ideals. Thank you, God bless you, and may God bless the United States of America.

Wow, what an incredible kick off to the General Election.

Obama '08

Sphere: Related Content

Andrew Sullivan got it right

Clinton gave her speech in a veritable bunker, with no wireless communication possible, no TVs or ways to communicate. She gave no concession and surrounded herself with only her fiercest of supporters. There was no advanced copy of her speech - she blindsided her own party.

Andrew Sullivan got it right in his assessment of the Clinton Speech.


The speech tonight was a remarkable one for a candidate who has lost the nomination, though not remarkable for a Clinton. It was an assertion that she had won the nomination and a refusal to concede anything to her opponent. Classless, graceless, shameless, relentless. Pure Clinton.

Her narcissism requires that she deprive her opponent of a night, or a second, of gratification or attention. And she has now won, in her Bush-like version of reality, 18 million votes. Her invitation for her supporters to email their suggestions to her website is pure theater, a way of keeping herself in the spotlight and maneuvering her delegates to demand a second spot on the ticket. The way she is now doing this - by an implicit threat, backed by McCain, to claim that Obama is an illegitimate nominee if she does not get her way - is designed to humiliate the nominee sufficiently to wound him enough to lose the election.

Either way, she is clearly intent on getting Obama defeated this fall if she is not offered the vice-presidency. And if she gets the veep nod, the way she has gotten it will allow her to argue that a November loss was not her loss. It was his. And she will run again in 2012.

She will not go away. The Clintons will never go away. And they will do all they can to cripple any Democrat who tries to replace them. In the tent or out of it, it is always about them. And they are no longer rivals to Obama; they are threats.

(Photo: Stan Honda/AFP/Getty.)

Absolutely incredible and disgusting, on this most Historic of nights for her to be so blindly narcissistic and self-serving, she seethes untruth more than any serpent and it has nothing to do with her sex though she beguiles people to believe it so.

Succubus, that's what she is, and the 18 million strong army she claims to helm is nothing more than smoke and mirrors when you look at the facts and the numbers. Congratulations tonight Hillary Clinton on stabbing the Democratic Party and it's principals, you so desperately claim to represent, in the heart.

If we loose in November, we can look back to this most historic night, a night where we should have coalesced and united you chose to rend us asunder for nothing more than yourself in the mirror - an image self-aggrandized.

Sphere: Related Content

Ding! Dong! The Primary's OVER

...which old Primary? The Democratic Primary, Ding! Dong! The Democratic Primary's OVER!!!

The Democratic Primary is finally OVER as the AP reports that tonight Hillary Clinton will concede that Barack Obama has the delegates and is the Nominee. According to CNN, the campaign denies she'll drop out, but as the AP points out:

The former first lady will stop short of formally suspending or ending her race in her speech in New York City.

She will pledge to continue to speak out on issues like health care. But for all intents and purposes, the two senior officials said, the campaign is over.

Most campaign staff will be let go and will be paid through June 15, said the officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to divulge her plans.

The advisers said Clinton has made a strategic decision to not formally end her campaign, giving her leverage to negotiate with Obama on various matters including a possible vice presidential nomination for her. She also wants to press him on issues he should focus on in the fall, such as health care.

As the Washington Post points out the end of this primary campaign will be a huge relief especially to Super delegates, elected officials Party Bosses who get to vote at the convention. Quoting Gilda Cobb-Hunter an undeclared from SC,

"Honestly, it's going to be over with and it's going to be a huge relief," Cobb-Hunter said. "The candidate is going to be such an obvious choice after the end of the primaries that nobody will care one way or another if I commit or not, and that's just great."..."It would have been easy to be done and decided with all this a long time ago. But now I'm feeling better, because I've let the people have their say and it's all going to be over pretty soon."

And the torrent of Super delegates begins today as Obama is poised to get the magic number of 2118.5 after this evenings Primaries close. The added bonus of the news about Hillary will no doubt add to the ease of Super delegates mind of "coming out" in the hours that remain today.

Now for mindless enjoyment of symbolic value....

Sphere: Related Content

Saturday, May 31, 2008

The failure of American Feminism

Last week Peggy Noonan had an intriguing post in the Wall Street Journal about the success of feminism in the wider world. She pointed to such pioneers and leaders as Golda Meir, first female Prime Minister of Israel (Mother of Israel), Indira Gahndi who was even called "the old witch," and who can forget the Iron Maiden herself, Margaret Thatcher British PM. Of these women she said

Great women, all different, but great in terms of size, of impact on the world and of struggles overcome. Struggle was not something they read about in a book. They did not use guilt to win election—it comes up zero if you Google “Thatcher” and “You’re just picking on me because I’m a woman.” Instead they used the appeals men used: stronger leadership, better ideas, a superior philosophy.
She proceeds to explain that in contrast to this global interpretation of the feminist movement that the version in America over the past twenty years has become watered down and mired in victimism. The quintessential example being in that of the candidacy of Hillary Clinton. One need not look any further than the Rules and Bylaws meeting today and the Hillary Supporters and Protesters outside who take the notion of victimism beyond the pale.

And this woman is not alone (I'm thinking the Women Count PAC), there are plenty if you just look at YouTube. It makes one wonder about the future of the feminist movement in this post modern world.

Ms. Noonan doesn't offer an alternative, but I will. Gov. Neapolitano of Arizona, Sebelius of Kansas, Sen. Amy Klobuchar, and even outside of this nation we can look again to our close ally Israel Tzipi Livini.

Sphere: Related Content

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

A Small donor

Andrew Sullivan says this guy must be a small donor....

And speaking of small donors, it looks like Barry had another great month, (although down since February), as the campaign just released the numbers from April - they raised over $31 million tacking on an additional 200,000 new donors who gave less than $200.00. The average donation the Obama camp is receiving from its huge swath of supporters has risen a bit to $91.00. If you want you can still help me meet my fundraising goal by donating $5.00.

In other news the debt of the She-Clinton's campaign conversely has maintained at $20 million dollars, despite earlier reports of it ballooning to $31 million which would have been slightly ironic.

Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

The Iranian Issue


The Jerusalem Post has two (three) very interesting articles today on Iran.

In one it reiterates a long time American (Israeli) security concern that a Nuclear Iran would simply spur development of a Nuclear Middle East - proof seen in 13 Islamic Nations drafting nuclear programs in the wake of Irans declerations of intent, from secular Turkey who would be least likely to develop a weapons arsenal, to the Wahhabist Kingdom of Saudi Arabia who views the Shia of Iran as heretics and foes.

In the other article, it is reported that the Bush Administration plans to attack Iran by the end of his term (January 19th, 2009). Sources said:

The official claimed that a senior member of the president's entourage, which concluded a trip to Israel last week, said during a closed meeting that Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney were of the opinion that military action was called for.

However, the official continued, "the hesitancy of Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice" was preventing the administration from deciding to launch such an attack on the Islamic Republic, for the time being.

This of course is in contrast to the recomendations of another key partner in the region, Russia, who believes it is as much a 'nightmare' to have a nuclear Iran, is urging restraint and a more nuanced approach. The Russian Ambassador to Israel is quoted as saying a more prudent approach would be that which the west used against Ghadaffi after the Lockerbie bombings,

The best advice, he said, was to "get Gaddafi's name off the front pages, leave him alone with his domestic problem, because he won't
be able to stand them."

"Regimes like that, Gaddafi and [Mahmoud] Ahmadinejad, use outside threat as inner consolidation of the society. I am convinced of that," he said.

Rather than pushing Iran into a corner, Russia's position, Stegniy said, was designed to keep Iran at the negotiating table, and to keep the Intentional Atomic Energy Agency inside Iran. ...

"We will do our utmost to keep Ahmadinejad from having a nuclear weapon. It is the consensus aim. We may differ on the means, but we are united on strategy."


That position, it should be noted - concerning saber rattling for the sake of guising against Domestic distress is similar to what Barack Obama suggested this past Sunday: "Iran, Cuba, Venezuela - these countries are tiny compared to the Soviet Union. They don't pose a serious threat to us the way the Soviet Union posed a threat to us. And yet we were willing to talk to the Soviet Union at the time when they were saying, `We're going to wipe you off the planet."'

The question now is: will George Bush and his administration, with the country distracted by domestic problems such as the economy and skyrocketing fuel costs, use the authority granted by Congress in declaring the Iranian Quds a terror organization (thank you Hillary and John McCain), to extend the war from Iraq to Iran - furthering this cowboy diplomacy of going in guns blazing leaving yourself no ammunition to defend yourself from all of this missed shots you fired that has failed over the past seven years.

The irony being of course that one could argue that the actions President Bush and his war cronies are suggesting is the same saber rattling and distractions from Domestic ills that Mahmoud is using in Iran.
I don't have the ear of the President, who believes he has the ear of God vis-a-vis his warmongering council of Neo-Cons, but if I did, I'd urge - like our Russian partners - restraint. And against his predilictions for cowboy diplomacy, would recommend that he assert the Krauthammer Holocaust Decleration, which is and of itself a face of Neo-Con ideology if only a softer facet:

"It shall be the policy of this nation to regard any nuclear attack upon Israel [or other Middle Eastern Ally] by Iran, or originating in Iran, as an attack by Iran on the United States, requiring a full retaliatory response upon Iran. ..."

while pursuing the more cautious diplomacy as advocated by Defense Secretary Gates and Secretary of State Rice, and leave it to the next administration, an administration that will be done with this cowboy mentality.

Sphere: Related Content

Sunday, May 18, 2008

The gay worship of the She-Clinton

I've written on a couple of occasions questioning the blind support from the LGBT community for Hillary over the past few weeks in the waning days of this nomination battle for the Democratic party.

Today I received the following photo from a friend that clearly illustrates said support for the She-Clinton, but doesn't advance our understanding of why the tribe supports her. I suppose without that understanding we can only look at this picture... and laugh.

Sphere: Related Content